The recent earthquake in Myanmar has once again un derscored the vulnerabilities of a region prone to seismic activity. As the tremors rattled infrastructure and communities, it raised crucial questions about preparedness, governance, and the broader geopolitical and humanitarian implications of such natural disasters in a politically fragile country.

Myanmar sits at the intersection of major tectonic plates, making it susceptible to earthquakes. Despite this well-established risk, disaster preparedness and response mechanisms remain inadequate, particularly in rural areas where infrastructure is weak. The government’s limited capacity, combined with on going internal conflicts, has left many communities unprepared for large-scale disasters. In the aftermath of the earthquake, rescue and relief operations face logistical hurdles, exacerbated by damaged roads and strained resources. One of the most pressing concerns is the impact on vulnerable populations, including displaced persons.

Advertisement

Myanmar’s ongoing political turmoil has led to internal displacement on a massive scale, with thousands living in makeshift shelters. These fragile structures stand little chance against seismic shocks, making those displaced by conflict doubly vulnerable. With emergency response mechanisms already stretched thin, the earthquake further deepens the humanitarian crisis. Beyond the immediate human toll, the earthquake also has economic repercussions. Myanmar’s economy has struggled in recent years due to political instability and international sanctions.

Key sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and trade are likely to suffer setbacks due to infrastructure damage. The disruption of transport networks can impede supply chains, affecting not just Myanmar but also its trading partners, particularly China, India, and Thailand. Given that Myanmar is a transit route for regional trade, any disruption can ripple through Southeast Asia’s economy. International response to the disaster will be telling. While humanitarian aid is expected in the wake of such tragedies, Myanmar’s po – litical situation complicates external assistance. Many Western countries maintain sanctions on the ruling military junta, limiting formal engagement.

However, regional powers such as China and India have strategic interests in Myanmar and have stepped in with aid, using disaster diplomacy to strengthen ties. China, in particular, has been expanding its influence through infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road Initiative, and assistance in earthquake relief could cement its role as Myanmar’s primary ally. The earthquake also raises broader concerns about Southeast Asia’s overall disaster re – silience. Myanmar is not alone in facing seismic risks ~ neigh – bo uring countries such as Thailand were also affected. The event should serve as a wake-up call for greater regional cooperation on disaster preparedness.

ASEAN, which includes Myanmar, has mechanisms for coordinated response, but their effectiveness remains limited by national political constraints. A more robust, collaborative approach to earthquake pre – paredness ~ ranging from early warning systems to joint em – ergency response drills ~ could mitigate future disasters. While earthquakes are unavoidable, the scale of destruction and human suffering depends largely on a nation’s preparedness and response capacity. Without urgent investments in disaster resilience, Myanmar and the region remain at risk of repeating this cycle of devastation. But who will bell the generals?